What is the main difference between HyperDX and Maple?

HyperDX and Maple are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: HyperDX or Maple?

The choice between HyperDX and Maple depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from HyperDX to Maple?

Migration between HyperDX and Maple is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

HyperDX vs Maple

Learn how HyperDX and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

HyperDX

Open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, traces, metrics and errors. Fast search, automatic clustering, $0.40/GB pricing.

Visit HyperDX Read more

9,874stars+62(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
17 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v0.6.3
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hyperdxio/hyperdx

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,768stars+108(+6.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
15 hours ago
Repository age
7 months
Version
v0.0.22
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Detailed Comparison

HyperDX appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

HyperDX wins

Community & Popularity

HyperDX significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 9,874 stars compared to 1,768 stars on GitHub. This 5.6x difference suggests HyperDX has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, HyperDX has 463 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 108 stars in the last 30 days (+6.5%) against adding 62 stars for HyperDX (+0.6%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with HyperDX last updated 17 hours ago and Maple 15 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses Next.js, SCSS while Maple leverages Python, Rust, Vue, Swift.

HyperDX wins

Project Maturity

HyperDX has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Maple which began 7 months ago. This 2.5-year head start suggests HyperDX may have more mature features and established processes.

HyperDX wins

Licensing

HyperDX is licensed under MIT, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Error Tracking.

Comparable