What is the main difference between Logstash and Maple?

Logstash and Maple are both log management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Logstash or Maple?

The choice between Logstash and Maple depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Logstash to Maple?

Migration between Logstash and Maple is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Logstash vs Maple

Learn how Logstash and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these log management tools is best for you.

Logstash

Logstash is a free and open server-side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources, transforms it, and sends it to your desired destination.

Visit Logstash Read more

14,973stars+11(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
16 years
Version
v9.5.6
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
elastic/logstash

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,950stars+135(+7.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
15 hours ago
Repository age
9 months
Version
v0.3.5
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Detailed Comparison

Both Logstash and Maple have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Logstash wins

Community & Popularity

Logstash significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 14,973 stars compared to 1,950 stars on GitHub. This 7.7x difference suggests Logstash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Logstash has 3,501 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 135 stars in the last 30 days (+7.4%) against adding 11 stars for Logstash (+0.1%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Logstash last updated 2 days ago and Maple 15 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logstash uses C, Java, Ruby while Maple leverages JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Rust, Vue, Swift.

Logstash wins

Project Maturity

Logstash has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Maple which began 9 months ago. This 15.5-year head start suggests Logstash may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Logstash also focuses on ETL & Data Integration, Stream Processing while Maple extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).

Comparable