Learn how Logstash and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these log management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Logstash and Maple have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
Logstash significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 14,926 stars compared to 1,701 stars on GitHub. This 8.8x difference suggests Logstash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Logstash has 3,504 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Maple is growing faster, adding 41 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 19 stars for Logstash (+0.1%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logstash last updated 7 hours ago and Maple 7 hours ago.
Logstash has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Maple which began 6 months ago. This 15.5-year head start suggests Logstash may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Logstash also focuses on ETL & Data Integration, Stream Processing while Maple extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Logstash and Maple offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.