Learn how Bugsink and GlitchTip differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these error tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
2.6.2Self-hosted
YesRepository
bugsink/bugsink
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
6 yearsLicense
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
glitchtip/glitchtip
GlitchTip appears to have several advantages over Bugsink, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bugsink significantly outpaces GlitchTip in community adoption with 2,148 stars compared to 170 stars on GitHub. This 12.6x difference suggests Bugsink has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bugsink has 143 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
GlitchTip is growing faster, adding 5 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 54 stars for Bugsink (+2.6%). GlitchTip is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bugsink last updated 1 day ago and GlitchTip 2 days ago.
GlitchTip has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Bugsink which began 2 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests GlitchTip may have more mature features and established processes.
GlitchTip is licensed under MIT, while Bugsink's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Error Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: GlitchTip extends into Uptime Monitoring.
Both Bugsink and GlitchTip offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.