Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Grafana and Metabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Grafana appears to have several advantages over Metabase, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grafana leads in popularity with 76,179 stars vs 48,634 stars for Metabase. The 57% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,533 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 10 hours ago and Metabase 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses Python, Golang, Ruby while Metabase leverages Clojure.
Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Metabase which began 12 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.
Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while Metabase extends into BI Platforms.
Both Grafana and Metabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Grafanavs
HyperDXActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository
