Learn how Evidence and Metabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Metabase appears to have several advantages over Evidence, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 46,977 stars compared to 6,191 stars on GitHub. This 7.6x difference suggests Metabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,393 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Metabase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Evidence was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Metabase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Metabase leverages Bash, JSX, Clojure.
Metabase has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Evidence is licensed under MIT, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Both Evidence and Metabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs