Learn how Evidence and Metabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Evidence and Metabase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 49,339 stars compared to 6,949 stars on GitHub. This 7.1x difference suggests Metabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,832 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Evidence and Metabase are moving at much the same rate, adding 83 stars and adding 480 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.2% vs +1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 2 days ago and Metabase 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Metabase leverages Bash, JSX, Clojure.
Metabase has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Evidence is licensed under MIT, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Both Evidence and Metabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.