Learn how Evidence and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.

Redash appears to have several advantages over Evidence, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Redash significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 28,737 stars compared to 6,835 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Redash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redash has 4,616 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Redash shows more recent development activity with its last commit 20 hours ago, while Evidence was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Redash is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Redash leverages JSX, Python.
Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Evidence is licensed under MIT while Redash uses BSD-2-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms, Data Visualization.
Evidence provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Repository