What is the main difference between Evidence and Redash?

Evidence and Redash are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Evidence or Redash?

The choice between Evidence and Redash depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Evidence to Redash?

Migration between Evidence and Redash is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

Evidence vs Redash

Learn how Evidence and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Evidence

Create data-driven websites and reports using SQL and Markdown, with automatic visualizations and interactive elements.

Visit Evidence Read more

7,077stars+111(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
40.1.8
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
evidence

Redash

Redash is an open-source data visualization and analytics platform that helps teams make sense of their data through SQL queries and interactive dashboards.

Visit Redash Read more

28,853stars+25(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
20 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v26.9.0
License
BSD-2-Clause
Repository
getredash/redash

Detailed Comparison

Both Evidence and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Redash wins

Community & Popularity

Redash significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 28,853 stars compared to 7,077 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Redash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redash has 4,632 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Evidence wins

Growth Momentum

Evidence is growing faster, adding 111 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 25 stars for Redash (+0.1%). Evidence is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 6 hours ago and Redash 20 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Redash leverages JSX, Python.

Redash wins

Project Maturity

Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Evidence is licensed under MIT while Redash uses BSD-2-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.

Evidence wins

Hosting & Deployment

Evidence provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.