Learn how Evidence and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Evidence and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Redash significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 28,767 stars compared to 6,896 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests Redash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redash has 4,624 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Evidence is growing faster, adding 96 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 46 stars for Redash (+0.2%). Evidence is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 4 days ago and Redash 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Redash leverages JSX, Python.
Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Evidence is licensed under MIT while Redash uses BSD-2-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Evidence provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.