What is the main difference between Redash and Shaper?

Redash and Shaper are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Redash or Shaper?

The choice between Redash and Shaper depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Redash to Shaper?

Migration between Redash and Shaper is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Redash vs Shaper

Learn how Redash and Shaper differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Redash

Redash is an open-source data visualization and analytics platform that helps teams make sense of their data through SQL queries and interactive dashboards.

Visit Redash Read more

28,850stars+37(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v26.9.0
License
BSD-2-Clause
Repository
getredash/redash

Shaper

Build interactive analytics dashboards with SQL and embed them directly into your product. Open-source platform with full data control and DuckDB flexibility.

Visit Shaper Read more

1,265stars+14(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.26.1
License
MPL-2.0
Repository
taleshape-com/shaper

Detailed Comparison

Redash appears to have several advantages over Shaper, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Redash wins

Community & Popularity

Redash significantly outpaces Shaper in community adoption with 28,850 stars compared to 1,265 stars on GitHub. This 22.8x difference suggests Redash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redash has 4,637 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Shaper wins

Growth Momentum

Shaper is growing faster, adding 14 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 37 stars for Redash (+0.1%). Shaper is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Redash last updated 1 day ago and Shaper 10 hours ago.

Redash wins

Project Maturity

Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Shaper which began 2 years ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.

Redash wins

Licensing

Redash uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Shaper's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable