Learn how OpenBB and Shaper differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.26.1License
MPL-2.0Repository
taleshape-com/shaper
OpenBB appears to have several advantages over Shaper, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenBB significantly outpaces Shaper in community adoption with 74,724 stars compared to 1,265 stars on GitHub. This 59.1x difference suggests OpenBB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenBB has 7,772 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenBB is growing faster, adding 1,240 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 14 stars for Shaper (+1.1%). OpenBB is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenBB last updated 2 days ago and Shaper 10 hours ago.
OpenBB has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Shaper which began 2 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests OpenBB may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenBB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Shaper uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenBB also focuses on Financial Data, Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) while Shaper extends into Data Visualization.
OpenBB provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Shaper may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs