Learn how Evidence and OpenBB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days

Both Evidence and OpenBB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenBB significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 74,913 stars compared to 7,077 stars on GitHub. This 10.6x difference suggests OpenBB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenBB has 7,814 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Evidence and OpenBB are moving at much the same rate, adding 111 stars and adding 1,217 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.6% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 6 hours ago and OpenBB 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while OpenBB leverages JSX, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Evidence beginning 5 years ago and OpenBB 6 years ago.
Evidence uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenBB's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Evidence also focuses on Data Visualization while OpenBB extends into Financial Data, Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A).
Both Evidence and OpenBB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.