Learn how Evidence and Frappe Insights differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Evidence appears to have several advantages over Frappe Insights, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Evidence significantly outpaces Frappe Insights in community adoption with 6,247 stars compared to 902 stars on GitHub. This 6.9x difference suggests Evidence has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe Insights has 444 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Frappe Insights shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Evidence was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Frappe Insights is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Frappe Insights leverages Bash, JSX, Python, Vue.
Evidence has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Frappe Insights which began 4 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Evidence may have more mature features and established processes.
Evidence uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Frappe Insights's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Evidence also focuses on Data Visualization.
Evidence provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Frappe Insights may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs