Learn how Frappe Insights and Metabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Metabase appears to have several advantages over Frappe Insights, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase significantly outpaces Frappe Insights in community adoption with 49,339 stars compared to 1,016 stars on GitHub. This 48.6x difference suggests Metabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,832 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Frappe Insights and Metabase are moving at much the same rate, adding 11 stars and adding 480 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Insights last updated 16 hours ago and Metabase 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe Insights uses Python, Vue while Metabase leverages Clojure.
Metabase has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Frappe Insights which began 4 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.
Frappe Insights is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Metabase extends into Data Visualization.
Metabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Frappe Insights may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.