Learn how Metabase and OpenBB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Metabase and OpenBB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Metabase having 48,998 stars and OpenBB having 72,499 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenBB has 7,481 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenBB is growing faster, adding 1,276 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 524 stars for Metabase (+1.1%). OpenBB is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Metabase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while OpenBB was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Metabase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Metabase uses Bash, Clojure while OpenBB leverages Python.
Metabase has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to OpenBB which began 6 years ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenBB is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Metabase also focuses on Data Visualization while OpenBB extends into Financial Data, Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A).
Both Metabase and OpenBB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.