Learn how Frappe Insights and OpenBB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenBB appears to have several advantages over Frappe Insights, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenBB significantly outpaces Frappe Insights in community adoption with 72,499 stars compared to 1,008 stars on GitHub. This 71.9x difference suggests OpenBB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenBB has 7,481 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Frappe Insights is growing faster, adding 33 stars in the last 30 days (+3.4%) against adding 1,276 stars for OpenBB (+1.8%). Frappe Insights is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Insights last updated 2 days ago and OpenBB 1 month ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe Insights uses Bash, Vue.
OpenBB has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Frappe Insights which began 4 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests OpenBB may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenBB extends into Financial Data, Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A).
OpenBB provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Frappe Insights may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.