Learn how Frappe Insights and Shaper differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v3.15.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
frappe/insights
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.27.2License
MPL-2.0Repository
taleshape-com/shaper
Frappe Insights appears to have several advantages over Shaper, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Frappe Insights having 1,045 stars and Shaper having 1,278 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe Insights has 542 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Frappe Insights is growing faster, adding 19 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 19 stars for Shaper (+1.5%). Frappe Insights is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Insights last updated 3 days ago and Shaper 19 hours ago.
Frappe Insights uses JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Vue while Shaper leverages Golang.
Frappe Insights has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Shaper which began 2 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Frappe Insights may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Frappe Insights is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Shaper uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Shaper extends into Data Visualization.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs