Learn how Frappe Insights and Shaper differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v3.15.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
frappe/insights
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.26.1License
MPL-2.0Repository
taleshape-com/shaper
Both Frappe Insights and Shaper have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Frappe Insights having 1,031 stars and Shaper having 1,265 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Frappe Insights has 527 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Frappe Insights and Shaper are moving at much the same rate, adding 13 stars and adding 14 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Insights last updated 2 days ago and Shaper 10 hours ago.
Frappe Insights has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Shaper which began 2 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Frappe Insights may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Frappe Insights is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Shaper uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Shaper extends into Data Visualization.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs