What is the main difference between Evidence and Shaper?

Evidence and Shaper are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Evidence or Shaper?

The choice between Evidence and Shaper depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Evidence to Shaper?

Migration between Evidence and Shaper is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Evidence vs Shaper

Learn how Evidence and Shaper differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Evidence

Create data-driven websites and reports using SQL and Markdown, with automatic visualizations and interactive elements.

Visit Evidence Read more

7,118stars+89(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
40.1.8
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
evidence

Shaper

Build interactive analytics dashboards with SQL and embed them directly into your product. Open-source platform with full data control and DuckDB flexibility.

Visit Shaper Read more

1,278stars+19(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
19 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.27.2
License
MPL-2.0
Repository
taleshape-com/shaper

Detailed Comparison

Evidence appears to have several advantages over Shaper, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Evidence wins

Community & Popularity

Evidence significantly outpaces Shaper in community adoption with 7,118 stars compared to 1,278 stars on GitHub. This 5.6x difference suggests Evidence has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Evidence has 445 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Evidence and Shaper are moving at much the same rate, adding 89 stars and adding 19 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 4 hours ago and Shaper 19 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Evidence uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SvelteKit while Shaper leverages Golang.

Evidence wins

Project Maturity

Evidence has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Shaper which began 2 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Evidence may have more mature features and established processes.

Evidence wins

Licensing

Evidence uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Shaper's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.

Evidence wins

Hosting & Deployment

Evidence provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Shaper may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.