Learn how Apache Superset and Evidence differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Apache Superset appears to have several advantages over Evidence, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache Superset significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 72,544 stars compared to 6,191 stars on GitHub. This 11.7x difference suggests Apache Superset has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache Superset has 17,095 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Apache Superset shows more recent development activity with its last commit 14 hours ago, while Evidence was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Apache Superset is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache Superset uses Bash, JSX, Python while Evidence leverages SvelteKit.
Apache Superset has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Apache Superset may have more mature features and established processes.
Evidence uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Apache Superset's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Both Apache Superset and Evidence offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs