Learn how Evidence and Lightdash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Evidence and Lightdash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Evidence having 6,896 stars and Lightdash having 6,105 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Lightdash has 767 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Lightdash is growing faster, adding 105 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 96 stars for Evidence (+1.4%). Lightdash is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 4 days ago and Lightdash 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Lightdash leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Evidence beginning 5 years ago and Lightdash 5 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lightdash extends into Semantic Layer Platforms.
Both Evidence and Lightdash offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.