Learn how Evidence and Lightdash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Evidence and Lightdash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Evidence having 6,997 stars and Lightdash having 6,182 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Lightdash has 791 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Evidence and Lightdash are moving at much the same rate, adding 71 stars and adding 52 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 20 hours ago and Lightdash 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Lightdash leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Evidence beginning 5 years ago and Lightdash 6 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lightdash extends into Semantic Layer Platforms.
Both Evidence and Lightdash offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.