What is the main difference between Evidence and Grafana?

Evidence and Grafana are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Evidence or Grafana?

The choice between Evidence and Grafana depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Evidence to Grafana?

Migration between Evidence and Grafana is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Evidence vs Grafana

Learn how Evidence and Grafana differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Evidence

Create data-driven websites and reports using SQL and Markdown, with automatic visualizations and interactive elements.

Visit Evidence Read more

6,896stars+96(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
40.1.8
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
evidence-dev/evidence

Grafana

Grafana unifies metrics, logs, traces, profiles, and business data into one OpenTelemetry-native platform with AI-assisted root cause analysis and adaptive cost controls.

Visit Grafana Read more

76,514stars+622(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v13.2.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
grafana/grafana

Detailed Comparison

Both Evidence and Grafana have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins

Community & Popularity

Grafana significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 76,514 stars compared to 6,896 stars on GitHub. This 11.1x difference suggests Grafana has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,660 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Evidence wins

Growth Momentum

Evidence is growing faster, adding 96 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 622 stars for Grafana (+0.8%). Evidence is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Evidence last updated 4 days ago and Grafana 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Grafana leverages Bash, JSX, Python, Golang, Ruby.

Grafana wins

Project Maturity

Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.

Evidence wins

Licensing

Evidence uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Grafana's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization. However, they also have distinct specializations: Evidence also focuses on BI Platforms while Grafana extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM).

Comparable