Ad
 
Learn more

Evidence vs Grafana

Learn how Evidence and Grafana differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Evidence

Evidence

Create data-driven websites and reports using SQL and Markdown, with automatic visualizations and interactive elements.
  • Stars


    6,249
  • Forks


    343
  • Last commit


    2 months ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Evidence
Favicon of Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a multi-platform open source analytics and interactive visualization web application that provides charts, graphs, and alerts for the web.
  • Stars


    73,501
  • Forks


    13,816
  • Last commit


    1 hour ago
  • Repository age


    12 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Grafana

Detailed Comparison

Grafana appears to have several advantages over Evidence, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins
Community & Popularity

Grafana significantly outpaces Evidence in community adoption with 73,501 stars compared to 6,249 stars on GitHub. This 11.8x difference suggests Grafana has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 13,816 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Grafana wins
Development Activity

Grafana shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 hour ago, while Evidence was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Grafana is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Evidence uses SvelteKit while Grafana leverages Bash, JSX, Python, Golang, Ruby.

Grafana wins
Project Maturity

Grafana has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Evidence which began 5 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.

Evidence wins
Licensing

Evidence uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Grafana's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization. However, they also have distinct specializations: Evidence also focuses on BI Platforms while Grafana extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM).

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Evidence and Grafana offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.