Learn how Grafana and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Grafana and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grafana leads in popularity with 75,622 stars vs 28,708 stars for Redash. The 163% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,293 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 14 hours ago and Redash 10 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses Bash, Golang, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Grafana beginning 13 years ago and Redash 13 years ago.
Redash uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Grafana's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while Redash extends into BI Platforms.
Grafana provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.