What is the main difference between Grafana and Redash?

Grafana and Redash are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Grafana or Redash?

The choice between Grafana and Redash depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Grafana to Redash?

Migration between Grafana and Redash is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Grafana vs Redash

Learn how Grafana and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Grafana

Grafana unifies metrics, logs, traces, profiles, and business data into one OpenTelemetry-native platform with AI-assisted root cause analysis and adaptive cost controls.

Visit Grafana Read more

76,514stars+622(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v13.2.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
grafana/grafana

Redash

Redash is an open-source data visualization and analytics platform that helps teams make sense of their data through SQL queries and interactive dashboards.

Visit Redash Read more

28,767stars+46(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v26.3.0
License
BSD-2-Clause
Repository
getredash/redash

Detailed Comparison

Grafana appears to have several advantages over Redash, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins

Community & Popularity

Grafana leads in popularity with 76,514 stars vs 28,767 stars for Redash. The 166% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,660 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Grafana wins

Growth Momentum

Grafana is growing faster, adding 622 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 46 stars for Redash (+0.2%). Grafana is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 7 hours ago and Redash 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses Bash, Golang, Ruby.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Grafana beginning 13 years ago and Redash 13 years ago.

Redash wins

Licensing

Redash uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Grafana's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while Redash extends into BI Platforms.

Grafana wins

Hosting & Deployment

Grafana provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.