What is the main difference between Grafana and Redash?

Grafana and Redash are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Grafana or Redash?

The choice between Grafana and Redash depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Grafana to Redash?

Migration between Grafana and Redash is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Grafana vs Redash

Learn how Grafana and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Grafana

Grafana is a multi-platform open source analytics and interactive visualization web application that provides charts, graphs, and alerts for the web.

Visit Grafana Read more

Stars
73,375
Forks
13,783
Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
12 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 1 hour ago.

Redash

Redash is an open-source data visualization and analytics platform that helps teams make sense of their data through SQL queries and interactive dashboards.

Visit Redash Read more

Stars
28,526
Forks
4,584
Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
12 years
License
BSD-2-Clause

View Repository

Auto-fetched 1 hour ago.

Detailed Comparison

Both Grafana and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins

Community & Popularity

Grafana leads in popularity with 73,375 stars vs 28,526 stars for Redash. The 157% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 13,783 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 12 hours ago and Redash 4 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses Bash, Golang, Ruby.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Grafana beginning 12 years ago and Redash 12 years ago.

Redash wins

Licensing

Redash uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Grafana's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM) while Redash extends into BI Platforms.

Grafana wins

Hosting & Deployment

Grafana provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.