Learn how Metabase and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.

Both Metabase and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase leads in popularity with 48,634 stars vs 28,737 stars for Redash. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,725 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Metabase last updated 9 hours ago and Redash 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Metabase uses Bash, Clojure while Redash leverages Python.
Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Metabase which began 12 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.
Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms, Data Visualization.
Metabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Repository