What is the main difference between Metabase and Redash?

Metabase and Redash are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Metabase or Redash?

The choice between Metabase and Redash depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Metabase to Redash?

Migration between Metabase and Redash is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.

Learn More

Metabase vs Redash

Learn how Metabase and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Metabase

Open-source business intelligence platform for data exploration, visualization, and sharing. Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions effortlessly.

Visit Metabase Read more

48,998stars+524(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
v0.63.15
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
metabase/metabase

Redash

Redash is an open-source data visualization and analytics platform that helps teams make sense of their data through SQL queries and interactive dashboards.

Visit Redash Read more

28,767stars+46(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v26.3.0
License
BSD-2-Clause
Repository
getredash/redash

Detailed Comparison

Both Metabase and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Metabase wins

Community & Popularity

Metabase leads in popularity with 48,998 stars vs 28,767 stars for Redash. The 70% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,777 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Metabase wins

Growth Momentum

Metabase is growing faster, adding 524 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 46 stars for Redash (+0.2%). Metabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Metabase last updated 7 hours ago and Redash 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Metabase uses Bash, Clojure while Redash leverages Python.

Redash wins

Project Maturity

Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Metabase which began 12 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.

Redash wins

Licensing

Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.

Metabase wins

Hosting & Deployment

Metabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.