Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.Learn how Metabase and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Both Metabase and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase leads in popularity with 48,709 stars vs 28,742 stars for Redash. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,740 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Metabase is growing faster, adding 524 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 47 stars for Redash (+0.2%). Metabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Metabase last updated 12 hours ago and Redash 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Metabase uses Bash, Clojure while Redash leverages Python.
Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Metabase which began 12 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.
Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Metabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
