Learn how DataLens and Metabase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Metabase appears to have several advantages over DataLens, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Metabase significantly outpaces DataLens in community adoption with 48,907 stars compared to 1,698 stars on GitHub. This 28.8x difference suggests Metabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 6,769 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Metabase is growing faster, adding 542 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 4 stars for DataLens (+0.2%). Metabase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with DataLens last updated 10 hours ago and Metabase 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: DataLens uses Python while Metabase leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Clojure.
Metabase has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to DataLens which began 3 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.
DataLens is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Both DataLens and Metabase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.