Learn how Apache Superset and DataLens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Apache Superset appears to have several advantages over DataLens, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache Superset significantly outpaces DataLens in community adoption with 74,447 stars compared to 1,698 stars on GitHub. This 43.8x difference suggests Apache Superset has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache Superset has 18,161 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Apache Superset is growing faster, adding 471 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 4 stars for DataLens (+0.2%). Apache Superset is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Superset last updated 8 hours ago and DataLens 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache Superset uses CSS, Typescript, JSX.
Apache Superset has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to DataLens which began 3 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests Apache Superset may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.
Both Apache Superset and DataLens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs