Learn how Apache Superset and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Apache Superset and Redash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache Superset leads in popularity with 73,221 stars vs 28,630 stars for Redash. The 156% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Apache Superset has 17,570 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Superset last updated 12 hours ago and Redash 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache Superset uses Bash.
Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Apache Superset which began 11 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.
Redash uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Apache Superset's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms, Data Visualization.
Apache Superset provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Redash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.