Learn how Frappe Insights and Redash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Redash appears to have several advantages over Frappe Insights, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Redash significantly outpaces Frappe Insights in community adoption with 28,720 stars compared to 974 stars on GitHub. This 29.5x difference suggests Redash has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redash has 4,617 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Insights last updated 14 hours ago and Redash 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe Insights uses Bash, Vue.
Redash has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Frappe Insights which began 4 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Redash may have more mature features and established processes.
Redash uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Frappe Insights's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Redash extends into Data Visualization.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
