What is the main difference between Metabase and Shaper?

Metabase and Shaper are both data visualization tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Metabase or Shaper?

The choice between Metabase and Shaper depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Metabase to Shaper?

Migration between Metabase and Shaper is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Metabase vs Shaper

Learn how Metabase and Shaper differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these data visualization tools is best for you.

Metabase

Open-source business intelligence platform for data exploration, visualization, and sharing. Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions effortlessly.

Visit Metabase Read more

50,346stars+644(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
v0.65.4
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
metabase/metabase

Shaper

Build interactive analytics dashboards with SQL and embed them directly into your product. Open-source platform with full data control and DuckDB flexibility.

Visit Shaper Read more

1,278stars+19(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
19 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.27.2
License
MPL-2.0
Repository
taleshape-com/shaper

Detailed Comparison

Metabase appears to have several advantages over Shaper, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Metabase wins

Community & Popularity

Metabase significantly outpaces Shaper in community adoption with 50,346 stars compared to 1,278 stars on GitHub. This 39.4x difference suggests Metabase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Metabase has 7,010 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Metabase and Shaper are moving at much the same rate, adding 644 stars and adding 19 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Metabase last updated 4 hours ago and Shaper 19 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Metabase uses JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Clojure while Shaper leverages Golang.

Metabase wins

Project Maturity

Metabase has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Shaper which began 2 years ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests Metabase may have more mature features and established processes.

Shaper wins

Licensing

Shaper is licensed under MPL-2.0, while Metabase's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Data Visualization, BI Platforms.

Metabase wins

Hosting & Deployment

Metabase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Shaper may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.