Learn how ProjectDiscovery and Tracecat differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these security automation (siem/soar) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

ProjectDiscovery appears to have several advantages over Tracecat, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ProjectDiscovery significantly outpaces Tracecat in community adoption with 28,297 stars compared to 3,598 stars on GitHub. This 7.9x difference suggests ProjectDiscovery has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ProjectDiscovery has 3,389 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with ProjectDiscovery last updated 14 hours ago and Tracecat 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProjectDiscovery uses Golang, Java while Tracecat leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.
ProjectDiscovery has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Tracecat which began 2 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests ProjectDiscovery may have more mature features and established processes.
ProjectDiscovery uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tracecat's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Security Automation (SIEM/SOAR). However, they also have distinct specializations: ProjectDiscovery also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Vulnerability Scanning while Tracecat extends into Workflow Orchestration.
Tracecat provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ProjectDiscovery may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.