Learn how Focalboard and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Focalboard, particularly in activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Focalboard leads in popularity with 26,280 stars vs 15,526 stars for OpenProject. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,349 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenProject shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Focalboard was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenProject is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses Golang, Swift, C# while OpenProject leverages CSS, Ruby, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Focalboard which began 6 years ago. This 8.0-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces.
Both Focalboard and OpenProject offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs