Learn how Focalboard and Plane differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

Plane appears to have several advantages over Focalboard, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plane leads in popularity with 54,235 stars vs 26,280 stars for Focalboard. The 106% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 4,940 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plane shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Focalboard was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Plane is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses SCSS, Golang, Swift, C# while Plane leverages CSS, Python, Next.js.
Focalboard has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Plane which began 4 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Focalboard may have more mature features and established processes.
Plane is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management.
Both Focalboard and Plane offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs