Learn how Focalboard and Plane differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Focalboard and Plane have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plane leads in popularity with 47,875 stars vs 26,038 stars for Focalboard. The 84% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 3,991 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Focalboard last updated 4 days ago and Plane 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses SCSS, Golang, Swift, C# while Plane leverages CSS, Python, Next.js.
Focalboard has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Plane which began 3 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Focalboard may have more mature features and established processes.
Plane is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management.
Both Focalboard and Plane offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs