Learn how Focalboard and Manage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Focalboard and Manage have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Focalboard significantly outpaces Manage in community adoption with 26,080 stars compared to 62 stars on GitHub. This 420.6x difference suggests Focalboard has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,530 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Focalboard last updated 4 days ago and Manage 22 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses SCSS, Golang, Swift, C# while Manage leverages CSS, Next.js.
Focalboard has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Manage which began 3 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Focalboard may have more mature features and established processes.
Manage is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management while Manage extends into Task Management.
Both Focalboard and Manage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs