Learn how Focalboard and Huly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Huly appears to have several advantages over Focalboard, particularly in growth, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Focalboard and Huly show comparable community engagement with 26,415 and 27,406 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,577 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Huly is growing faster, adding 413 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 105 stars for Focalboard (+0.4%). Huly is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Huly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 days ago, while Focalboard was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Huly is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses JSX, Golang, Swift, C# while Huly leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Focalboard beginning 6 years ago and Huly 5 years ago.
Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Agile Project Management while Huly extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Both Focalboard and Huly offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs