Learn how Focalboard and Huly differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

Huly appears to have several advantages over Focalboard, particularly in activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Focalboard and Huly show comparable community engagement with 26,254 and 26,304 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,555 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Huly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while Focalboard was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Huly is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses JSX, Golang, Swift, C# while Huly leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Focalboard beginning 6 years ago and Huly 5 years ago.
Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Agile Project Management while Huly extends into Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Both Focalboard and Huly offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs