Learn how Focalboard and Leantime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

Leantime appears to have several advantages over Focalboard, particularly in activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Focalboard leads in popularity with 26,255 stars vs 10,086 stars for Leantime. The 160% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,554 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Leantime shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Focalboard was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Leantime is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang, Swift, C# while Leantime leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Focalboard which began 6 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Leantime is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management while Leantime extends into Task Management.
Both Focalboard and Leantime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs