Learn how Focalboard and Vikunja differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Focalboard and Vikunja have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Focalboard significantly outpaces Vikunja in community adoption with 26,080 stars compared to 4,038 stars on GitHub. This 6.5x difference suggests Focalboard has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,530 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Focalboard last updated 4 days ago and Vikunja 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses JSX, Swift, C# while Vikunja leverages Vue.
Vikunja has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Focalboard which began 6 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Vikunja may have more mature features and established processes.
Vikunja is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Focalboard's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management while Vikunja extends into Task Management.
Both Focalboard and Vikunja offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs