Ad
 
Learn More

Focalboard vs Planka

Learn how Focalboard and Planka differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Focalboard

Focalboard

Self-hostable project management tool with Kanban boards, calendars, and table views, built for teams using Mattermost or standalone.
26,415stars+105(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Focalboard
Favicon of Planka

Planka

Self-hosted Kanban board for agile teams. Unlimited boards, real-time sync, GDPR-compliant, and available as a free Community Edition or paid Pro.
12,425stars+162(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Planka

Detailed Comparison

Planka appears to have several advantages over Focalboard, particularly in growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Focalboard wins
Community & Popularity

Focalboard leads in popularity with 26,415 stars vs 12,425 stars for Planka. The 113% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Focalboard has 2,577 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Planka wins
Growth Momentum

Planka is growing faster, adding 162 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 105 stars for Focalboard (+0.4%). Planka is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Planka wins
Development Activity

Planka shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 days ago, while Focalboard was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Planka is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Focalboard uses Typescript, Golang, Swift, C# while Planka leverages CSS, Python.

Planka wins
Project Maturity

Planka has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Focalboard which began 6 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Planka may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Focalboard also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces while Planka extends into Task Management.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Focalboard and Planka offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.