Learn how NocoBase and NocoDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

NocoDB appears to have several advantages over NocoBase, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoDB leads in popularity with 64,592 stars vs 23,703 stars for NocoBase. The 173% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, NocoDB has 4,995 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 313 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 442 stars for NocoDB (+0.7%). NocoBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 10 hours ago and NocoDB 11 hours ago.
NocoDB has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to NocoBase which began 6 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests NocoDB may have more mature features and established processes.
NocoDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools while NocoDB extends into Database Tools & GUIs.
Both NocoBase and NocoDB offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.