Learn how Convertigo and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
8.4.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
convertigo
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v2.2.37Self-hosted
YesRepository
nocobase/nocobase
Both Convertigo and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoBase significantly outpaces Convertigo in community adoption with 24,821 stars compared to 387 stars on GitHub. This 64.1x difference suggests NocoBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,948 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 375 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 0 stars for Convertigo (0%). NocoBase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convertigo last updated 7 hours ago and NocoBase 8 hours ago.
Convertigo has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to NocoBase which began 6 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Convertigo may have more mature features and established processes.
Convertigo is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Convertigo and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.