Learn how Convertigo and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Convertigo and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
NocoBase significantly outpaces Convertigo in community adoption with 24,017 stars compared to 384 stars on GitHub. This 62.5x difference suggests NocoBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,856 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 469 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 0 stars for Convertigo (0%). NocoBase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convertigo last updated 14 hours ago and NocoBase 6 hours ago.
Convertigo has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to NocoBase which began 6 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Convertigo may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Convertigo also focuses on Integration Platforms while NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Convertigo and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.