Learn how AppSmith and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v2.6.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
appsmithorg/appsmith
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v2.2.41Self-hosted
YesRepository
nocobase/nocobase
Both AppSmith and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AppSmith leads in popularity with 41,190 stars vs 24,868 stars for NocoBase. The 66% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, AppSmith has 4,826 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 361 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 148 stars for AppSmith (+0.4%). NocoBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppSmith last updated 2 days ago and NocoBase 8 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with AppSmith beginning 6 years ago and NocoBase 6 years ago.
AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both AppSmith and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.