Learn how NocoBase and undb differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

NocoBase appears to have several advantages over undb, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoBase significantly outpaces undb in community adoption with 23,703 stars compared to 2,971 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests NocoBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,825 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 313 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 9 stars for undb (+0.3%). NocoBase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
NocoBase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while undb was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests NocoBase is being more actively maintained.
NocoBase has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to undb which began 4 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests NocoBase may have more mature features and established processes.
undb is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools while undb extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS), NoSQL & Document Databases.
Both NocoBase and undb offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.