Learn how NocoBase and undb differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 10 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

NocoBase appears to have several advantages over undb, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoBase significantly outpaces undb in community adoption with 22,338 stars compared to 2,941 stars on GitHub. This 7.6x difference suggests NocoBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,590 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while undb was last updated 10 months ago. This suggests NocoBase is being more actively maintained.
NocoBase has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to undb which began 3 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests NocoBase may have more mature features and established processes.
undb is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools while undb extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS), NoSQL & Document Databases.
Both NocoBase and undb offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.