Learn how Budibase and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Budibase and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Budibase having 28,221 stars and NocoBase having 23,703 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,825 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 313 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 80 stars for Budibase (+0.3%). NocoBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Budibase last updated 7 hours ago and NocoBase 10 hours ago.
Budibase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to NocoBase which began 6 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Budibase may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Budibase and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.