Learn how Budibase and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
24 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v3.50.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
budibase/budibase
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v2.2.41Self-hosted
YesRepository
nocobase/nocobase
Both Budibase and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Budibase having 28,395 stars and NocoBase having 24,868 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,952 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 361 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 67 stars for Budibase (+0.2%). NocoBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Budibase last updated 24 hours ago and NocoBase 8 hours ago.
Budibase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to NocoBase which began 6 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Budibase may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Budibase and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.