Learn how Budibase and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Budibase and ToolJet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Budibase having 27,830 stars and ToolJet having 37,746 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,010 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Budibase last updated 1 day ago and ToolJet 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Budibase uses Next.js, Nuxt.js while ToolJet leverages SCSS, NestJS, Perl.
Budibase has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to ToolJet which began 5 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Budibase may have more mature features and established processes.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Budibase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code.
Both Budibase and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.