Learn how AppSmith and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both AppSmith and ToolJet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both AppSmith and ToolJet show comparable community engagement with 40,838 and 40,868 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,440 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ToolJet is growing faster, adding 2,556 stars in the last 30 days (+6.7%) against adding 227 stars for AppSmith (+0.6%). ToolJet is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppSmith last updated 13 hours ago and ToolJet 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppSmith uses Python, Java while ToolJet leverages SCSS, Perl, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with AppSmith beginning 6 years ago and ToolJet 5 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 while ToolJet uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code.
Both AppSmith and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.