Learn how NocoBase and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

ToolJet appears to have several advantages over NocoBase, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet leads in popularity with 38,037 stars vs 23,002 stars for NocoBase. The 65% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,123 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 11 hours ago and ToolJet 10 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with NocoBase beginning 6 years ago and ToolJet 5 years ago.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both NocoBase and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.