Learn how NocoBase and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

ToolJet appears to have several advantages over NocoBase, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet leads in popularity with 40,529 stars vs 23,705 stars for NocoBase. The 71% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,365 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ToolJet is growing faster, adding 2,287 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 310 stars for NocoBase (+1.3%). ToolJet is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 9 hours ago and ToolJet 10 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with NocoBase beginning 6 years ago and ToolJet 5 years ago.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both NocoBase and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.