Learn how NocoBase and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v2.2.41Self-hosted
YesRepository
nocobase/nocobase
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.20.256-ltsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tooljet/tooljet
Both NocoBase and ToolJet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet leads in popularity with 41,213 stars vs 24,875 stars for NocoBase. The 66% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,509 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 359 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 142 stars for ToolJet (+0.3%). NocoBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 5 hours ago and ToolJet 5 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with NocoBase beginning 6 years ago and ToolJet 6 years ago.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both NocoBase and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.