Learn how NocoBase and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

ToolJet appears to have several advantages over NocoBase, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet leads in popularity with 37,746 stars vs 22,151 stars for NocoBase. The 70% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,010 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 8 hours ago and ToolJet 10 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with NocoBase beginning 5 years ago and ToolJet 5 years ago.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both NocoBase and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.