Learn how NocoBase and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both NocoBase and ToolJet have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet leads in popularity with 41,010 stars vs 24,388 stars for NocoBase. The 68% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,460 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 448 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 214 stars for ToolJet (+0.5%). NocoBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NocoBase last updated 14 hours ago and ToolJet 14 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with NocoBase beginning 6 years ago and ToolJet 6 years ago.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: NocoBase also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both NocoBase and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.