Learn how Convertigo and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

ToolJet appears to have several advantages over Convertigo, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet significantly outpaces Convertigo in community adoption with 40,840 stars compared to 384 stars on GitHub. This 106.4x difference suggests ToolJet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,433 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ToolJet is growing faster, adding 2,550 stars in the last 30 days (+6.7%) against adding 0 stars for Convertigo (0%). ToolJet is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Convertigo last updated 14 hours ago and ToolJet 3 hours ago.
Convertigo has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to ToolJet which began 5 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Convertigo may have more mature features and established processes.
ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Convertigo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Convertigo also focuses on Integration Platforms.
Both Convertigo and ToolJet offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.