Learn how AppSmith and Convertigo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both AppSmith and Convertigo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
AppSmith significantly outpaces Convertigo in community adoption with 41,060 stars compared to 387 stars on GitHub. This 106.1x difference suggests AppSmith has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, AppSmith has 4,806 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Convertigo is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 193 stars for AppSmith (+0.5%). Convertigo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with AppSmith last updated 6 hours ago and Convertigo 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: AppSmith uses JSX, Python while Convertigo leverages SCSS, SvelteKit.
Convertigo has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to AppSmith which began 6 years ago. This 2.5-year head start suggests Convertigo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Convertigo uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code.
Both AppSmith and Convertigo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.