Learn how Budibase and Convertigo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Budibase and Convertigo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
Budibase significantly outpaces Convertigo in community adoption with 28,253 stars compared to 384 stars on GitHub. This 73.6x difference suggests Budibase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Budibase has 2,200 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Budibase and Convertigo are moving at much the same rate, adding 70 stars and adding 0 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs 0%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Budibase last updated 2 hours ago and Convertigo 14 hours ago.
Convertigo has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Budibase which began 7 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Convertigo may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Convertigo extends into Integration Platforms.
Both Budibase and Convertigo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.