Learn how Budibase and Convertigo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v3.50.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
budibase/budibase
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
8.4.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
convertigo
Both Budibase and Convertigo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Budibase significantly outpaces Convertigo in community adoption with 28,376 stars compared to 387 stars on GitHub. This 73.3x difference suggests Budibase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Budibase has 2,236 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Budibase and Convertigo are moving at much the same rate, adding 44 stars and adding 0 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs 0%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Budibase last updated 11 hours ago and Convertigo 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Budibase uses JSX, Next.js, Nuxt.js while Convertigo leverages SCSS, Java, SvelteKit.
Convertigo has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Budibase which began 7 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Convertigo may have more mature features and established processes.
Convertigo is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Budibase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code.
Both Budibase and Convertigo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.