What is the main difference between Budibase and Rowy?

Budibase and Rowy are both low-code/no-code platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Budibase or Rowy?

The choice between Budibase and Rowy depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Budibase to Rowy?

Migration between Budibase and Rowy is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.

Learn More

Learn more

Budibase vs Rowy

Learn how Budibase and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Budibase

Low-code platform for creating custom business applications quickly. Design, automate, and deploy with ease.

Visit Budibase Read more

Stars
28,038
Forks
2,166
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
7 years
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

95/100

View Repository

Rowy

A low-code platform for creating robust backends, complete with a spreadsheet UI for easy data management and custom functions.

Visit Rowy Read more

Stars
6,815
Forks
551
Last commit
2 years ago
Repository age
7 years

Activity score

36/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Budibase appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Budibase wins

Community & Popularity

Budibase significantly outpaces Rowy in community adoption with 28,038 stars compared to 6,815 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Budibase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Budibase has 2,166 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Budibase wins

Development Activity

Budibase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Rowy was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Budibase is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Budibase uses Bash, Next.js, Nuxt.js.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Budibase beginning 7 years ago and Rowy 7 years ago.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).

Budibase wins

Hosting & Deployment

Budibase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider