Learn how Grist and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Grist appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grist leads in popularity with 11,454 stars vs 6,836 stars for Rowy. The 68% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grist has 609 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Grist is growing faster, adding 171 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 13 stars for Rowy (+0.2%). Grist is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Grist shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Grist is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grist uses Bash, Python while Rowy leverages JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Grist beginning 6 years ago and Rowy 7 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grist also focuses on BI Platforms, Database Tools & GUIs while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Grist provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository