Learn how Grist and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v1.7.22License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
gristlabs/grist-core
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v3.0.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
buildship-ai/rowy
Grist appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grist leads in popularity with 12,066 stars vs 6,846 stars for Rowy. The 76% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grist has 680 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Grist is growing faster, adding 145 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 2 stars for Rowy (0%). Grist is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Grist shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Rowy was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Grist is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grist uses Bash, Python while Rowy leverages JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Grist beginning 6 years ago and Rowy 7 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grist also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs, BI Platforms while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Grist provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.