Learn how Grist and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Grist appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grist leads in popularity with 11,213 stars vs 6,816 stars for Rowy. The 65% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grist has 593 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Grist shows more recent development activity with its last commit 19 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Grist is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grist uses Bash, Python while Rowy leverages JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Grist beginning 6 years ago and Rowy 7 years ago.
Grist is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Rowy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grist also focuses on BI Platforms, Database Tools & GUIs while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Grist provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.