Learn how Grist and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Grist appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in popularity, activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grist leads in popularity with 10,998 stars vs 6,805 stars for Rowy. The 62% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grist has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Grist shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Grist is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grist uses Bash, Python while Rowy leverages JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Grist beginning 6 years ago and Rowy 7 years ago.
Grist is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Rowy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Grist also focuses on BI Platforms, Database Tools & GUIs while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).
Grist provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.