Learn how Baserow and Grist differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Grist appears to have several advantages over Baserow, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grist leads in popularity with 10,998 stars vs 4,733 stars for Baserow. The 132% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Baserow has 583 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Baserow last updated 5 hours ago and Grist 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Baserow uses SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js, Django while Grist leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Baserow beginning 6 years ago and Grist 6 years ago.
Grist is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Baserow's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Baserow also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Relational Databases (SQL) while Grist extends into BI Platforms, Database Tools & GUIs.
Both Baserow and Grist offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.