Learn how Baserow and Grist differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Baserow and Grist have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grist leads in popularity with 11,970 stars vs 6,175 stars for Baserow. The 94% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Baserow has 767 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Baserow is growing faster, adding 228 stars in the last 30 days (+3.8%) against adding 143 stars for Grist (+1.2%). Baserow is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Baserow last updated 6 hours ago and Grist 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Baserow uses SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js, Django while Grist leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Baserow beginning 6 years ago and Grist 6 years ago.
Baserow uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Grist's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Baserow also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Relational Databases (SQL) while Grist extends into Database Tools & GUIs, BI Platforms.
Both Baserow and Grist offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.