Learn how Baserow and Mathesar differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Baserow appears to have several advantages over Mathesar, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Baserow and Mathesar show comparable community engagement with 5,604 and 5,096 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Baserow has 688 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Baserow is growing faster, adding 264 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 47 stars for Mathesar (+0.9%). Baserow is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Baserow last updated 5 hours ago and Mathesar 22 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Baserow uses Vue, Nuxt.js, Django while Mathesar leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Baserow beginning 6 years ago and Mathesar 5 years ago.
Baserow uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Mathesar's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Baserow also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Relational Databases (SQL) while Mathesar extends into Database Tools & GUIs.
Both Baserow and Mathesar offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Baserowvs
AITableLast 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
