Learn how Baserow and Mathesar differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Baserow appears to have several advantages over Mathesar, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Baserow having 5,837 stars and Mathesar having 5,114 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Baserow has 715 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Baserow is growing faster, adding 289 stars in the last 30 days (+5.2%) against adding 20 stars for Mathesar (+0.4%). Baserow is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Baserow last updated 13 hours ago and Mathesar 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Baserow uses Vue, Nuxt.js, Django while Mathesar leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Baserow beginning 6 years ago and Mathesar 5 years ago.
Baserow uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Mathesar's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Baserow also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Relational Databases (SQL) while Mathesar extends into Database Tools & GUIs.
Both Baserow and Mathesar offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.