Learn how Mathesar and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Mathesar and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoBase significantly outpaces Mathesar in community adoption with 22,217 stars compared to 4,934 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests NocoBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,558 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mathesar last updated 22 hours ago and NocoBase 4 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mathesar beginning 5 years ago and NocoBase 6 years ago.
Mathesar is licensed under GPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mathesar also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs while NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Mathesar and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.