Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Mathesar and NocoBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Both Mathesar and NocoBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NocoBase significantly outpaces Mathesar in community adoption with 23,654 stars compared to 5,096 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests NocoBase has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NocoBase has 2,824 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NocoBase is growing faster, adding 310 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 47 stars for Mathesar (+0.9%). NocoBase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mathesar last updated 22 hours ago and NocoBase 7 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Mathesar beginning 5 years ago and NocoBase 6 years ago.
Mathesar is licensed under GPL-3.0, while NocoBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mathesar also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs while NocoBase extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Mathesar and NocoBase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Mathesarvs
BudibaseLast 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository
