Ad
 
Learn more

Mathesar vs Rowy

Learn how Mathesar and Rowy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Mathesar

Mathesar

A self-hosted tool that provides an intuitive, spreadsheet-style interface for viewing, editing, and querying PostgreSQL databases without technical expertise.
  • Stars


    4,934
  • Forks


    471
  • Last commit


    22 hours ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    GPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Mathesar
Favicon of Rowy

Rowy

A low-code platform for creating robust backends, complete with a spreadsheet UI for easy data management and custom functions.
  • Stars


    6,805
  • Forks


    545
  • Last commit


    1 year ago
  • Repository age


    7 years
View Repository

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Rowy

Detailed Comparison

Mathesar appears to have several advantages over Rowy, particularly in activity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Mathesar having 4,934 stars and Rowy having 6,805 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Rowy has 545 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Mathesar wins
Development Activity

Mathesar shows more recent development activity with its last commit 22 hours ago, while Rowy was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Mathesar is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mathesar uses Bash, Python, SCSS while Rowy leverages JSX.

Rowy wins
Project Maturity

Rowy has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Mathesar which began 5 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Rowy may have more mature features and established processes.

Mathesar wins
Licensing

Mathesar is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Rowy's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mathesar also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs while Rowy extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS).

Mathesar wins
Hosting & Deployment

Mathesar provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rowy may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.